The Workplace Relations Commission found Donal Herlihy’s complaints against Solvar Limited were not well founded, ruling that photographing jewellery for an associated business did not change his employment terms and that a disciplinary warning was not penalisation. The decision was dated 31 May 2023. Herlihy, a graphic designer and photographer, said he had not been notified in writing of a change to his terms when asked to photograph jewellery for NJO. Solvar said the work fell within his existing duties and followed its acquisition of NJO Designs Limited. The WRC found the work had not changed, only the type of jewellery he was asked to photograph. Herlihy also argued that he was penalised for raising concerns about his terms. The WRC found the disciplinary process was started because he refused an instruction to photograph NJO products, and that this was the employer’s primary motivation. It concluded he had not established penalisation. The decision notes that related Industrial Relations and unfair dismissal claims were dealt with separately.
WRC rejects Solvar photographer’s complaints over NJO jewellery work
Sources
Request a correction or removal
Contracts and notice
Labour Court affirms finding against Zhihua Yuan in Gaffney Mechanical appeal
TED2619
WRC rejects Atlas Language School training complaint
ADJ-00067214
WRC rejects Sara Abbas’s complaint over request for another employment contract copy
ADJ-00065506
WRC orders Koffee and Gossip to pay €579.72 in unpaid wages
ADJ-00064411
WRC awards nursery worker €1,280 over missing employment contract
ADJ-00063140
All contracts and notice decisions
Co. Dublin
Labour Court affirms dismissal of Pierce Parker’s complaint as vexatious
EDA2649
Labour Court rejects Tesco worker’s unfair dismissal appeal
UDD2635
Labour Court rejects Goelite Education Ltd worker’s pay appeal
PWD2625
Labour Court awards GoElite worker €1,122.53 for untaken leave
DWT2619
WRC awards garden centre worker €1,000 for unfair dismissal
ADJ-00061326